If you are an ASABE member or if your employer has arranged for access to the full-text, click the underlined title below to view.
Don't have access to the full text? Click here for options.
A Qualitative Assessment of Farmer Responses to the Certified Safe Farm Concept in Iowa andNebraska
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org
Citation: Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health. 4(3): 161-171 .
Authors: K. M. Thu, B. Pies, N. Roy, S. Von Essen, K. Donham
Keywords: Farm safety, Farmer health, Insurance incentives, Certified Safe Farm, Injury prevention,Qualitative data
This article summarizes the responses of 56 farmers in six different farmer focus
groups in Iowa and Nebraska to the development of a Certified Safe Farm (CSF)
program. The premise of the CSF is to use reductions in health insurance rates
and/or other financial incentives to motivate farmers to become healthier and safer. A
number of major midwestern insurance companies, farm groups, agribusinesses, and
agricultural health and safety specialists are involved in this initiative which is developing
in three stages. Stage one, completed in 1996, consisted of six farmer focus
groups in Iowa and Nebraska to gauge receptivity to the initiative and gain input on
how a CSF Program should be built. Stage two, completed in 1997, was the development
of the CSF system which consists of three components: (1) an on-farm safety
review; (2) an agricultural occupational health screening; and (3) an educational exercise.
Stage three consists of test piloting the system in Iowa and Nebraska over two
years from 1998 to 2000. This article provides a synopsis of stage one, the results from
the farmer focus groups conducted at an initial stage to qualitatively assess whether
the CSF concept was viable from farmers’ point of view and, if deemed viable, how to
develop the CSF. Findings from the farmer focus groups revealed no major barriers to
the development and testing of the CSF program, but did expose a number of considerations
subsequently incorporated into the CSF model.
|