ASABE Home


Publications Included

Search for full-text of electronic standards, journal articles, books, and papers.

About

E-mail Alert

Subscribe

Order Print

Join ASAE

ASAE Home

ASAE Technical Library Home


ASAE Technical Library

If you are an ASABE member or if your employer has arranged for access to the full-text, click the underlined title below to view.

Don't have access to the full text? Click here for options.

A Qualitative Assessment of Farmer Responses to the Certified Safe Farm Concept in Iowa andNebraska

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health. 4(3): 161-171 . 
Authors:   K. M. Thu, B. Pies, N. Roy, S. Von Essen, K. Donham
Keywords:   Farm safety, Farmer health, Insurance incentives, Certified Safe Farm, Injury prevention,Qualitative data

This article summarizes the responses of 56 farmers in six different farmer focus groups in Iowa and Nebraska to the development of a Certified Safe Farm (CSF) program. The premise of the CSF is to use reductions in health insurance rates and/or other financial incentives to motivate farmers to become healthier and safer. A number of major midwestern insurance companies, farm groups, agribusinesses, and agricultural health and safety specialists are involved in this initiative which is developing in three stages. Stage one, completed in 1996, consisted of six farmer focus groups in Iowa and Nebraska to gauge receptivity to the initiative and gain input on how a CSF Program should be built. Stage two, completed in 1997, was the development of the CSF system which consists of three components: (1) an on-farm safety review; (2) an agricultural occupational health screening; and (3) an educational exercise. Stage three consists of test piloting the system in Iowa and Nebraska over two years from 1998 to 2000. This article provides a synopsis of stage one, the results from the farmer focus groups conducted at an initial stage to qualitatively assess whether the CSF concept was viable from farmers’ point of view and, if deemed viable, how to develop the CSF. Findings from the farmer focus groups revealed no major barriers to the development and testing of the CSF program, but did expose a number of considerations subsequently incorporated into the CSF model.

 

American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MI 49085 | phone 269.429.0300 | fax 269.429.3852 | hq@asabe.org

© 2008 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers